Intercompany payment controls and evidence

Reconstruct who authorised a transfer and which policy governed it, including requests that were stopped.

The problem

Start with the job to be done

Treasury needs to know which instruction and approvals governed an internal transfer, and retain a useful record when a request is refused.

What Frame does

Check the signed inputs against the institution’s active policy before release and seal the authorised or refused decision, linked to the instruction and reported result.

What you keep

Define approval and payment policy, supply signed facts from existing systems, retain account control and execute/report the entries.

The record

Instruction identity and signed input binding; Policy identity/version and recorded authorisation or refusal; Reported settlement outcome when executed.

Scope

One workflow, then the next

Start with the institution’s existing accounts and controls. This does not replace your treasury system or connect every bank. If the policy gate is unavailable, release pauses.

Runs on

Your rules run first on every step, through the Rules Engine and the packs for this job.

More for corporates

Other use cases

Frame for Corporates →

Your next move

Let’s scope it

Tell us about the flow you want to run. We’ll come back with a first step that uses the systems you already have.

Two products. One free tool.

Start where you are

Understand the next move

The people. The purpose.

Intercompany payment controls and evidence

Start with the job to be done

What Frame does

What you keep

The record

One workflow, then the next

Other use cases

Let’s scope it

Thank you.
Let’s talk.

Start with the job to be done

What Frame does

What you keep

The record

One workflow, then the next

Other use cases

Let’s scope it

Thank you.Let’s talk.

Thank you.
Let’s talk.