Settlement Glossary
Depeg
A depeg is the moment a stablecoin's market price breaks away from the fixed value it is designed to hold, usually one unit of a fiat currency, because holders doubt they can redeem it at par.
A depeg is a stablecoin failing at the one job in its name. The coin is engineered to trade at a fixed value, almost always one dollar or one euro, and a depeg is the market pricing it below (or occasionally above) that value. Since the peg rests on the belief that one coin can always be exchanged for one unit of the reference currency, a depeg is best understood as a run: holders selling faster than the issuer can demonstrate that redemption at par still works.
The two defining episodes illustrate the two kinds. In March 2023, Circle disclosed that $3.3 billion of the reserves backing USDC, roughly 8% of the total, sat at the just-failed Silicon Valley Bank. USDC traded down to about 86 cents that weekend. When US authorities announced that SVB depositors would be made whole and Circle resumed processing redemptions on the Monday, the price snapped back to par. The reserves were sound; the doubt was about access to them, and once access was confirmed the peg held. The Federal Reserve later published a detailed post-mortem of the episode as a case study in stablecoin run dynamics.
TerraUSD, in May 2022, was the other kind. UST held its peg not with reserves but with an algorithm: a holder could always burn one UST for a dollar’s worth of a paired floating token, Luna. When UST slipped below par, holders burned en masse, hyperinflating Luna’s supply and collapsing its price, which destroyed the very asset the peg depended on. Roughly $45 billion of market value across the two tokens evaporated in a week. There was nothing to redeem and no par to return to.
What a depeg means in a settlement context
For institutions, the lesson is not that stablecoins are unusable; it is that the peg is a credit exposure with a price. A payment settled in a stablecoin carries the issuer’s risk from the moment of settlement finality until the coin is redeemed or exchanged. Treasury and risk teams therefore evaluate reserve composition, custody of reserves, attestation frequency, and redemption terms before approving a coin for settlement use, and diversify across coins where policy allows.
Regulation has converged on the same diagnosis. MiCA’s e-money token regime and the US GENIUS Act both mandate high-quality liquid reserves and redemption at par on demand, precisely the properties whose absence turned Terra’s slip into a collapse and whose presence let USDC recover in a weekend.
Common questions
- What causes a stablecoin to depeg?
- Doubt about redemption. A stablecoin holds its price because holders believe they can exchange it for exactly one dollar of reserves. Anything that shakes that belief, reserves trapped at a failed bank, opaque reserve composition, or a flawed stabilization design, sends holders to the exit, and the market price falls below par until the doubt is resolved. The mechanics differ by design, but the trigger is always the same: a question the issuer cannot answer fast enough.
- Do depegs recover?
- Reserve-backed depegs can. USDC fell to about 86 cents in March 2023 after Circle disclosed $3.3 billion of reserves at Silicon Valley Bank; when US authorities backstopped SVB deposits and Circle resumed redemptions, the price recovered within days. Design failures do not recover: TerraUSD, which relied on an algorithm rather than reserves, spiraled to near zero in May 2022 and erased roughly $45 billion of market value in a week.
- Why do depegs matter for institutional settlement?
- Because a payment settled in a stablecoin carries the coin's price risk until it is redeemed or exchanged. An institution holding a coin through a depeg realizes a loss on what was supposed to be cash. That is why institutional frameworks treat issuer quality, reserve composition, and redemption terms as settlement risks to underwrite, not technical details, and why regulation such as MiCA and the GENIUS Act centers on reserve and redemption requirements.
Related terms
Sources
- Federal Reserve, In the Shadow of Bank Runs: Lessons from the SVB Failure and Its Impact on Stablecoins (December 2025)
- CNBC, Stablecoin USDC breaks dollar peg after firm reveals $3.3 billion SVB exposure (11 March 2023)
- Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, Anatomy of a Run: The Terra Luna Crash (22 May 2023)
Last reviewed 2026-07-16