Explainers
Tokenized deposits: the institutional guide
What tokenized deposits are, how they differ from stablecoins and e-money on the balance sheet, why banks prefer them, who is live in 2026, and where the limits sit.
A tokenized deposit is an ordinary bank deposit in a new form: the same claim on the same bank, recorded on programmable ledger infrastructure so it can move around the clock, settle in seconds, and carry conditions in the payment itself. Nothing about the depositor’s legal position changes. What changes is what the deposit can do.
That one design choice, keeping the money a deposit, is why banks that dismissed earlier digital-money experiments are building these. It is worth being precise about how the instrument works, because the label “token” makes three very different things sound alike.
What the balance sheet says
Follow the money and the differences are stark. A stablecoin is issued by a special-purpose company against a segregated reserve; when a customer buys one, money leaves the banking system’s deposit base and becomes, in effect, a claim on a pool of Treasury bills. E-money works similarly under its own regime: safeguarded funds, a licensed non-bank issuer.
A tokenized deposit never leaves the bank. The customer’s balance is tokenized in place, remains a liability on the issuing bank’s balance sheet, and keeps funding the bank’s lending the way deposits always have. This is why the format appeals to bank treasurers and to central banks at the same time. The BIS has argued that tokenized deposits preserve the “singleness of money”, the property that a dollar at one bank equals a dollar at another because both settle at par through central bank money. Money that stays a deposit inherits that arrangement, along with prudential supervision and, where applicable, deposit insurance.
Regulators have started to say this formally. In December 2025, Germany’s BaFin classified the banking industry’s Commercial Bank Money Token (CBMT) as a deposit rather than an e-money token, taking it outside the EU’s MiCA regime entirely. The deposit treatment is the point: no separate issuance license, no segregated reserve, no new category of claim.
Why banks prefer the format
Three advantages recur across every program.
The charter does the regulatory work. A bank issuing a tokenized deposit is doing what banks are chartered to do, taking deposits, on new infrastructure. A stablecoin issuer needs a purpose-built regime (the GENIUS Act in the US, MiCA’s e-money token rules in the EU) and, typically, 12 to 18 months of authorization work before anything moves.
The economics stay home. Deposits fund lending. Every dollar that migrates from a deposit to a third-party stablecoin is a dollar of funding the bank loses. Tokenizing the deposit gives clients the speed and programmability they are asking for without the balance-sheet leak.
Interest is allowed. The GENIUS Act prohibits payment stablecoin issuers from paying holders any form of interest or yield, a restriction US regulators have proposed extending to affiliates and third parties. A deposit can bear interest under ordinary banking rules. For a corporate treasurer deciding where a large balance sits overnight, that asymmetry matters.
Who is live, who is piloting
As of July 2026 the map splits into live single-bank systems and multi-bank pilots.
Live. J.P. Morgan’s JPM Coin (JPMD), the first bank-issued USD deposit token on a public network, has been available to institutional clients on Base since November 2025, with native issuance on the Canton Network announced in January 2026 and rolling out in phases. Citi Token Services runs commercially across five markets, moving client balances between Citi branches continuously; in July 2026 Siam Commercial Bank became the first external financial institution live on the combined service. We cover both in detail in the deposit token landscape.
Piloting. The UK’s tokenised sterling deposit pilot, run by UK Finance with six major banks, tests marketplace payments, remortgaging, and digital asset settlement through mid-2026. Germany’s CBMT consortium, five banks and five industrial corporates including Siemens and Evonik, has completed live test transactions and moved to pre-production trials. At the official-sector level, Project Agorá is testing tokenized commercial bank deposits alongside central bank reserves with eight central banks and over 40 financial institutions.
The limit: every token is a claim on one bank
Here is the structural problem the pilots are circling. A tokenized deposit is a claim on the issuing bank, so it circulates naturally only among that bank’s customers. My bank’s token and your bank’s token are different instruments, and making them fungible requires exactly the interbank settlement machinery, an agreed way to clear and settle between banks, that the correspondent system provides today. Single-bank systems sidestep the question; multi-bank designs like CBMT and the UK pilot are attempts to answer it; reports in June 2026 that major US banks are planning a shared tokenized deposit network make the same point from the other direction. Until those arrangements mature, deposit tokens add powerful new rails inside each bank while leaving the between-banks problem, the one that makes cross-border payments take days, largely intact.
Where Frame fits
Frame is the settlement layer for global finance: one integration to orchestrate payments at scale across fiat rails, stablecoins, and tokenized deposits, with compliance enforced on every transaction and settlement in seconds instead of days.
Tokenized deposits are one of the three rail families Frame routes natively. An institution using Frame does not have to resolve the industry’s open question, which form of digital money wins, before acting: a payment enters through one integration and Frame routes it across whichever rail fits the corridor, the counterparty, and the policy that governs it, whether that is a deposit token, a regulated stablecoin, or a conventional fiat rail. Frame’s Rules Engine evaluates every transaction against its governing policies inside settlement, and each settled transaction produces verifiable evidence that its conditions were met. As deposit-token networks multiply, that rail-neutrality is what turns a fragmenting map into a routing decision.
Common questions
- What is a tokenized deposit?
- A tokenized deposit is an ordinary commercial bank deposit recorded on programmable ledger infrastructure instead of, or alongside, the bank's core ledger. The token is a direct claim on the issuing bank, the money stays on the bank's balance sheet, and the depositor relationship is unchanged. What changes is the form: the deposit can now move 24/7, settle in seconds, and carry programmable conditions.
- How is a tokenized deposit different from a stablecoin?
- A stablecoin is a claim on a special-purpose issuer backed by a segregated reserve of assets such as Treasury bills. A tokenized deposit is a claim on a bank, backed the way all deposits are backed: by the bank's balance sheet, prudential regulation, and, where applicable, deposit insurance. Stablecoins typically circulate on public networks and can be held by anyone; tokenized deposits are generally available only to the issuing bank's own customers.
- Are tokenized deposits covered by deposit insurance?
- Regulators that have ruled so far have treated them as deposits. Germany's BaFin classified the German banking industry's Commercial Bank Money Token as a deposit rather than an e-money token in December 2025, which means the EU's MiCA regime does not apply to it. As deposits, they sit inside the ordinary protections of banking law, including insurance schemes up to their limits, though the details depend on each program's structure and jurisdiction.
- Are tokenized deposits live today or still a pilot?
- Both, depending on the program. J.P. Morgan's USD deposit token, JPM Coin (JPMD), has been available to institutional clients on a public network since November 2025, and Citi Token Services operates commercially across five markets. The UK's tokenised sterling deposit pilot runs to mid-2026, and Germany's CBMT consortium is in pre-production trials. Live systems are single-bank; the multi-bank arrangements are still being tested.
- Why would a bank issue a tokenized deposit instead of a stablecoin?
- Three reasons recur. A tokenized deposit uses the bank's existing charter, so no separate issuance regime applies. The money remains a deposit on the bank's balance sheet, funding lending as deposits always have, rather than migrating into a third party's reserve. And under the US GENIUS Act, payment stablecoin issuers cannot pay holders interest, while a deposit can bear interest under ordinary banking rules.
Sources
- J.P. Morgan, first bank-issued USD deposit token on a public blockchain (12 November 2025)
- Markets Media, First institution goes live with Citi Token Services (July 2026)
- UK Finance, live pilot phase for tokenised sterling deposits
- Ledger Insights, Germany's deposit token consortium CBMT evolves for pre-production trials
- Ledger Insights, Siemens and Evonik pilot multi-bank CBMT deposit tokens
- Citi Institute, Beyond stablecoins: why bank tokens could boom (2026)
- Congressional Research Service, The stablecoin yield debate
- BIS Annual Economic Report 2023, Chapter III (the unified ledger and singleness of money)
- BIS, Project Agorá: exploring tokenisation of wholesale cross-border payments
Last reviewed 2026-07-16